

The Chicago Bears and the State of Indiana have moved one giant step closer to partnering on a massive stadium project near Wolf Lake in Hammond, Ind.
In a Ways and Means committee hearing in Indianapolis Thursday morning, Indiana Speaker of the House Todd Huston announced the Bears are willing to commit $2 billion to the project, while the rest would be funded with public money, similar to how Lucas Oil Stadium was funded.
In a statement provided to CHGO, the Chicago Bears said:
“The passage of SB 27 would mark the most meaningful step forward in our stadium planning efforts to date. We are committed to finishing the remaining site-specific necessary due diligence to support our vision to build a world-class stadium near the Wolf Lake area in Hammond, Indiana. We appreciate the leadership shown by Governor Braun, Speaker Huston, Senator Mishler and members of the Indiana General Assembly in establishing this critical framework and path forward to deliver a premier venue for all of Chicagoland and a destination for Bears fans and visitors from across the globe. We value our partnership and look forward to continuing to build our working relationship together.”
Amended Indiana Senate Bill 27 passed 24-0 in the committee, and the only remaining hurdle appears to be actual agreement between Indiana Gov. Mike Braun and the Chicago Bears.
In a statement released Thursday, Gov. Braun said: “Indiana is open for business, and our pro-growth environment continues to attract major opportunities like this partnership with the Chicago Bears. We’ve identified a promising site near Wolf Lake in Hammond and established a broad framework for negotiating a final deal. If approved, the proposed amendment to Senate Bill 27 puts forward the essential framework to complete this agreement, contingent upon site due diligence proceeding smoothly.
“The State of Indiana moves at the speed of business, and we’ve demonstrated that through our quick coordination between state agencies, local government, and the legislature to set the stage for a huge win for all Hoosiers. We have built a strong relationship with the Bears organization that will serve as the foundation for a public-private partnership, leading to the construction of a world-class stadium and a win for taxpayers.”
Wolf Lake straddles the Illinois-Indiana border. The Hegewisch neighborhood of Chicago is directly to the west.
While progress was made in Indiana Thursday morning, an Illinois House Finance and Revenue committee hearing was canceled.
The megaprojects bill that would potentially give the Bears the tax certainty they were seeking in Arlington Heights was on the agenda, but a source told CHGO early Thursday morning that the bill was not expected to be called on. The bill is sponsored by Rep. Mary Beth Canty, D-Arlington Heights. The Bears still own a 326-yard site in Arlington Heights (the former home of Arlington International Racecourse).
Thoughts from CHGO’s staff …
Adam Jahns: In a way, this feels unbelievable. Like, how did it reach this point?
Then again, the Bears have been ready to build a new stadium for years now.
They were ready when Ted Phillips was still team president. And they wanted to get shovels in the ground when Kevin Warren replaced Phillips.
It’s fair to say that Warren had to learn how Illinois politics work. But Illinois’ politicians never seemed to really want to work with the Bears on their development, either. Illinois’ loss now looks like Indiana’s big gain. The Bears found an interested and motivated partner in the State of Indiana.
Patrick Norton: It’s a bit stunning that things haven’t been ironed out with Arlington Heights over the last several legislative sessions in Illinois.
When the Bears purchased and closed on the 326-acre former site of Arlington International Racecourse back in 2023, the vision felt somewhat clear: build a football utopia and a surrounding entertainment center worthy of the league’s charter franchise.
Three years later, it’s still a possibility, but with much less land in Indiana, and across state lines, as the pride and joy of Illinois considers heading for the border.
But everything – except Iowa – feels on the table until shovels are in the ground and concrete is eventually poured.
Greg Braggs Jr: As someone born, raised and living in Crown Point, Indiana, what would it mean for the Chicago Bears to move to the Region? Transformative.
Northwest Indiana has always identified as Chicago to most people who live in the area. But never could I have imagined they’d put a $2 billion stadium there. It’s closer to Chicago than you’d think, too, with a view of the skyline and access to the lake.
We can all figure out the details for the first tailgate in my cul-de-sac when the time comes.
Updated at 9:30 a.m. to include reaction from Greg Braggs Jr.

6 Comments (4 conversations)
Andy Burdick
If this happens, in my opinion, it would be a gigantic mistake and unforced error on Illinois’ part. I understand there are many, many important legislative issues in front of the state, but the Bears leaving the Chicago area and the state of Illinois just should not be an acceptable outcome. No offense to the state of Indiana, but the Bears do not belong in Hammond; they belong in Chicago (whether city or suburbs, I don’t really care).
Bob A
This is all on Illinois. It’s been a power move by Pritzker and if they do officially choose Indiana, I guarantee there will be a ton of stories coming out of Springfield about how the Bears don’t care about people in Chicago or Illinois and this all about money. In reality, it is about money except it’s about the money that corrupt politicians in Illinois are trying to get a piece of and that includes the governor. If anyone votes for this moron in the next election they’re idiots. Look at his record since he’s been in office and the argument can be made he is the worst governor in the country. He’s at least in the team picture with Newsom & Walz and what they’ve done to their states.
Robert
Interesting that you only named blue state governors. Pritzker is far from perfect, but throwing more taxpayer money at billionaires with the promise of economic development would actually make Illinois’s economic standing worse. The scholarship around this issue is overwhelming.
Bob A
I think by any standards, you would be hard pressed to find a governor outside of those 3 that have put their states in worse situations. Possibly add NY but, again, a blue state. I don’t think all red states are perfect either but at this point in time it’s hard to find one that would be worse than the 3 I mentioned. Feel free to disagree.
Adam Beeson
Let’s be real, we all knew the Pritzker thinks he holds all the cards. When in reality he doesn’t hold any. This is not a surprise. Illinois has been anti-business for decades and this is yet another example of why this single party run state repeatedly fails! Vote them all out.
Ed Bailey-Mershon
Lived in Park Forest, Chicago Heights, worked at US Steel Supply in Hegewish some 50 yeas ago, agree with Braggs wholeheartedly. This is a problem 125 years in the making. In 25 years it will also be a problem again. Halas’ / McCaskeys being cash poor coupled with ethical standards most likely precluded more favorable deals with Chicago, Cook County and Illinois creating a longer term solution. Bears fan since 1970 says let them leave. Still think there is a deal to be made with all the Illinois governing groups and commissions. Pritizker is polling in single digits as Dem nominee in 2028. Sure he has polling telling him how crucial Bears deal is. What will soil samples will reveal? How far down is bedrock? Toxic waste from oil refineries, steel smelting?